Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Lake Management topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Committee forwards Lake Level Management Plan after public comments on broken gauging station

Del Norte County Resource Management Board · March 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The committee voted to forward a Lake Level Management Plan to the Board of Supervisors after public comment urged repairs to a broken gauging station at the Narrows and debate about target lake elevations and habitat restoration.

A county resource committee voted to forward a Lake Level Management Plan to the Board of Supervisors after residents and committee members debated lake-level targets and the condition of a key gauging station.

Jeff Reed, a resident who spoke during public comment, told the committee the Department of Water Resources — which Reed said owns the broken gauging station at the Narrows — estimated repairs at about $7,000 and suggested the county explore a low‑tech stick gauge as a backup. "It's important to have a reliable gauge that transmits to citizens of the state and our county as well as to NOAA," Reed said.

The committee discussed historical guidance from a 1989 Fish and Wildlife management plan, which commenters said targeted lake levels between roughly 4 and 6 feet for habitat benefits. Speakers argued the lake has been managed at higher levels in recent decades, contributing to shoreline sedimentation and loss of submerged aquatic vegetation. One presenter recommended a lower target range to support possible future salmon reintroduction; another participant noted a 2016 court action that had directed an 8‑foot level for Fish and Wildlife.

Committee members and staff described procedural next steps: the committee will forward its plan and supporting comments to the Board of Supervisors for review and public hearing. Chair (S3) called for a motion; a motion was seconded and the committee approved the recommendation by voice vote. The transcript records members responding "Aye" but does not provide a roll-call tally.

The committee did not adopt an enforceable change to state permits or Fish and Wildlife management; members said those authorities and Coastal Commission permits would still be involved if the county pursues a different operational level. The plan will proceed to the Board of Supervisors, where the county will present the committee's recommendation and collected public comments.