Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ethics Investigation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Special committee finds no legislative misconduct in complaints over floor photograph but flags procedural departures
Summary
The House's Special Investigative Committee reported that complaints against Representatives Mike Yin and Carly Provenza did not rise to legislative misconduct; the committee dismissed the complaints but said Provenza departed from procedural guidelines and urged attention to Joint Rule 22 and decorum.
Chairman Harrelson read the Special Investigative Committee's findings to the House on March 11, concluding that the complaints against Representatives Mike Yin and Carly Provenza did not constitute legislative misconduct under the cited constitutional provisions and joint rules. The committee recommended dismissal of the complaints but described departures from expected procedures, particularly in how a photograph taken on Feb. 9 was handled and later provided to the press.
Harrelson recited the committee's factual findings: a private citizen had been escorted to the House floor after adjournment and delivered legal campaign contributions to four representatives; Representative Provenza photographed the event and the image was later published. The committee found those private citizens' actions and the named representatives' conduct did not violate Article 3 Sections 42 or 43 of the Wyoming Constitution or legislative rules as a matter of legislative misconduct.
At the same time, the committee found that Representative Provenza's handling of the photograph and press disclosures "departed from the guidelines established by Joint Rule 22," which governs complaint handling and related decorum. Harrelson urged members to exercise constitutional rights with attention to the integrity and decorum of the chamber and stressed due-process protections in referring complaints for formal investigation.
Why it matters: The committee's report resolves an internal inquiry prompted by Feb. 9 events and related floor remarks, clearing the named members of formal legislative misconduct while flagging procedural concerns and the need to follow complaint-handling rules.
What the report cited: Harrelson referenced provisions of Joint Rule 22 (variously cited during the reading) describing procedures for complaint filing, referral to the management council, confidentiality of proceedings, and the House's authority to preserve order and punish contempt or disorderly behavior.
Next steps: The report as read resulted in dismissal of the complaints in the House record; Harrelson asked members to consider decorum and recommended that future complaints follow established rules for referral and due process.
