Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Energy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council directs law director to draft legislation on Bright Mountain solar participation

Napoleon City Council · March 18, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council reviewed a proposed 3 MW allocation in the Bright Mountain solar project (a Kentucky-based developer PPA), discussed contract length, out options, REC sales and peak‑shaving benefits, and voted to ask the law director to prepare legislation for first reading.

Council members spent an extended portion of the meeting discussing a proposed power purchase agreement (PPA) to buy up to 3 megawatts of power from the Bright Mountain solar project in Kentucky and directed the law director to draft legislation to bring the matter to first reading.

Lori, the electric committee representative, described the project as an opportunity for the city to add green energy to its portfolio after wind generation was decommissioned in Bowling Green, saying, "It would be a source of green energy for the city." Staff reported the recommended allocation for Napoleon is 3 MW and that amount would contribute roughly 4% of the city's annual energy needs.

City staff cautioned the council about term length and contract details. Kevin summarized operational and financial points, including that the agreement is a power purchase agreement rather than ownership, that "if it doesn't produce power, we don't buy that power," and that the project could be used for summertime peak shaving. Council members pressed for clarity about any out clauses, decommissioning responsibilities, REC (renewable energy certificate) sales, and comparative price impacts. Staff said a detailed pricing breakdown and participation list appear in the packet and can be provided at first reading; members suggested inviting an AMP representative for additional explanation.

Despite questions, councilors voted to direct the law director to draft the proposed resolution and to proceed to first reading at a later meeting. Several members said they wanted more detailed cost structure information before final passage; staff acknowledged further material and a possible deadline that might require suspension at future readings.

Provenance: Discussion and roll call on the Bright Mountain project and the directive to draft legislation are drawn from the meeting record.