Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Vape Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
York City committee advances licensing and zoning changes for smoke and vape shops
Summary
Council committee voted to place a licensing ordinance for existing smoke- and vape‑shops and a companion zoning amendment for future uses on the April 21 legislative agenda, while members and residents pressed for age limits, enforcement detail and data on currently affected businesses.
Council members moved forward on two measures intended to limit youth access to vaping and to curb the proliferation of dedicated vape shops in York City.
The committee voted to place a licensing ordinance (Article 3-24) that would require operating vape and smoke shops to obtain city licenses and submit to annual inspections, and to place a companion zoning amendment that would restrict where future shops can locate. Solicitor Flower told the committee the licensing piece can be applied to existing stores immediately while the zoning change would only govern new uses.
“Under Pennsylvania state law, we cannot shut down existing uses,” Solicitor Flower said, explaining why the city is pursuing licensing for current shops and zoning limits for new ones.
Council members debated several substantive details. One issue was the age threshold used in the licensing language: a councilmember suggested defining minors as age 21 so that no one under 21 could enter or be employed at a licensed vape shop; Solicitor Flower said the council can adopt either an 18‑ or 21‑year threshold but that the apparent intent was to protect younger teens. The draft also would bar coupons, restrict advertising, and require shops to keep working surveillance cameras with footage retained for 30 days.
Community members urged stricter enforcement of existing shops and flagged proximity to schools. “York High is literally gonna be surrounded with vape shops,” Sharif Hamid said, urging stronger measures for grandfathered stores. Manuel Gomez, who spoke during public comment, criticized the draft’s surveillance requirement as legally vulnerable, saying the proposal lacks technical standards and “is defective on its face.”
Council members asked administration staff to produce a count of existing shops and potential impacts so they can better assess which businesses would be affected by the definitions and the 15‑square‑foot retail threshold included in the zoning draft. The committee moved both items to the April 21 legislative agenda for further consideration.
What happens next: The licensing ordinance and the zoning amendment will appear on the April 21 legislative agenda; council requested additional documentation from administration on how many shops are in scope and legal input on enforcement tools.
