Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Local Government topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ephraim Council adopts WUI building standards, awards road work and approves several zoning actions

Ephraim City Council · March 18, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The City Council approved Ordinance 26-02 adopting wildland‑urban interface building standards to comply with state law, awarded a chip‑seal road contract to Christensen Ready Mix, and approved multiple land‑use applications including a conditional use permit and controversial rezone and General Plan amendment to allow a proposed RV park, with two 4–1 votes on the Parry items.

The Ephraim City Council on March 18 approved a package of ordinances, contracts and land‑use decisions, including a unanimous adoption of new Wildland‑Urban Interface (WUI) building standards required by state law, a competitively awarded road work contract, and several zoning approvals — among them a split 4–1 approval for a General Plan amendment and a rezone that would allow a proposed RV park.

Ordinance 26‑02: WUI building standards The council adopted Ordinance 26‑02 to implement WUI standards and a boundary map as required by House Bill 48 (effective Jan. 1, 2026). The ordinance includes requirements for vegetation management, ignition‑resistant construction techniques, and restrictions on fireworks within designated WUI areas. Staff said adoption would bring the city into compliance with state law and provide clearer expectations for property owners and builders.

Road project award For the 2026 chip seal overlay project, staff reported seven bids produced competitive pricing; Christensen Ready Mix was recommended based on prior performance with Manti City. Councilmember Loren Steck moved to award the contract; the motion was seconded and carried unanimously.

Conditional use permit — Marz kennel A Conditional Use Permit from Hau Yi Marz to operate a small residential animal rescue was approved subject to conditions including annual proof of vaccinations, spay/neuter policies, a maximum of 10 animals, and rear‑yard containment with a 10‑foot setback from property lines. The Planning Commission recommended approval.

Zoning and General Plan actions — Parry and CVG Council approved a rezone request from CVG‑Ephraim South LLC to change specified parcels from R2 to R1B to better match surrounding low‑density residential development; the Planning Commission recommended approval with conditions on lot sizes.

The most contested items involved parcel S‑625x3. Applicant Cody Parry sought a General Plan amendment to change the land‑use designation from medium‑density residential and a subsequent rezone from R3 to C2 to permit a proposed RV park. Council discussion highlighted concerns about neighborhood compatibility, traffic circulation, emergency access and limited site ingress. The Planning Commission was split on the rezone. Council approved both the General Plan amendment and the rezone by 4–1 votes (Aye: Beal, Steck, Birch, Dalene; Nay: Nordfelt) and required demonstration of legal access before development could proceed.

Votes at a glance - ECO 26‑02 (WUI building standards): Approved, unanimous. - ECR 26‑05 (Award road work bid to Christensen Ready Mix): Approved, unanimous. - CUP — Marz kennel license: Approved, unanimous; conditions include vaccinations, spay/neuter and max 10 animals. - CVG rezone R2→R1B: Approved, unanimous; conditions on lot frontages and minimum lot sizes. - Parry General Plan amendment (S‑625x3): Approved 4–1 (Aye: Beal, Steck, Birch, Dalene; Nay: Nordfelt). - Parry rezone R3→C2 (proposed RV park): Approved 4–1 (Aye: Beal, Steck, Birch, Dalene; Nay: Nordfelt); applicant must demonstrate legal access prior to development.

The council’s actions move several projects forward but leave outstanding conditions and requirements that developers must meet before construction can begin. No appeals or further administrative actions were recorded in the transcript.