Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Election Integrity Claims topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Citizen group urges Carlsbad council to place election-integrity resolution on a future agenda, citing claimed voter-roll anomalies

Carlsbad City Council · July 16, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

A group of volunteers identifying as United Sovereign Americans asked the council to consider a resolution alleging large-scale inaccuracies in California’s 2022 voter roll and to request state and federal remedies; speakers presented numerical claims and asked the city to place the measure on a future agenda.

A group of volunteers identifying as United Sovereign Americans used the public-comment period to ask the Carlsbad City Council to place a resolution on a future agenda calling for investigations and remedies related to alleged inaccuracies in California’s voter-roll database.

Skip Hammond introduced the group and said its "audit of the 2022 election" relied on volunteer data teams. Susan Kennedy read portions of the group's resolution, asserting numerical findings including, as quoted in the reading, "5,886,198 ineligible or uncertain registration violations found within the California state voter roll database" and "2,776,939 votes cast by ineligible or uncertain registrations." The resolution text also included a list of proposed remedies such as proof-of-citizenship requirements, public review of voter rolls 30 days before early voting, hand-marked ballots with verifiable imaging for tabulation, and an end-to-end, statistically valid audit.

Anne Muchinski and other volunteers urged the council to put the resolution on a future agenda and to vote to support the remedies. The speakers said they had shared their findings with state election officials and law enforcement and offered to provide more detailed information and documentation in writing.

Council did not take action on the resolution during the meeting. The request was made during the public-comment period only; no staff report or council referral was recorded in the transcript at this meeting.

The council did not comment substantively on the content of the group's claims during the meeting. The statements and numeric assertions in the reading were presented by group members and are included here as their claims; they were not independently verified by staff during the hearing.