Central Wisconsin lawmakers debate data-center guardrails as residents warn of energy and water impacts
Loading...
Summary
At the legislative breakfast, lawmakers described bills to set guardrails on data-center energy and water use while local officials and IT veterans warned about the strain such facilities could place on municipal utilities and the limited local tax benefit.
Data centers and how to regulate them were a major point of debate at the Wisconsin Rapids legislative breakfast, with lawmakers and local officials offering competing views on economic opportunity and resource risk.
One legislator urged a measured approach and described proposed legislation that would set guardrails for energy and water usage by data centers, saying the aim is to use “data science and industry experts” to guide policy. “The only serious proposal on the table right now is AB 722 because it actually sets guardrails and uses data science and industry experts,” the lawmaker said.
Local officials and an IT veteran pushed back, saying data centers can silently strain local utilities and provide limited property-tax yield. A local official argued, “For local municipalities, data centers are nothing but a life-sucking entity. They use up our natural resources. They have a huge footprint with a very small tax base.” That speaker said a 300-acre proposal would have produced little local tax revenue because much of the facility’s internal value is treated as personal property.
Panelists acknowledged the industry’s arrival is driven by global demand for computing capacity and described three policy responses: (1) a moratorium until more study is done; (2) guardrails that set standards on energy and water usage and renewable sourcing; and (3) stronger local controls over siting and nuisance issues such as noise.
Officials argued the technical challenge is significant: data centers use vast amounts of electricity and sophisticated cooling; renewable energy on a given site often cannot supply the facility’s full demand. One lawmaker said candidly, “Solar is deployable now. Wind is deployable now. But they’re not going to provide electrical needs of big complex industrial situations.”
Local leaders said municipalities should do due diligence, pursue ordinances that define data centers (including noise and water-use standards) and negotiate utility arrangements that prevent rate shocks for existing residents.
There were no formal votes at the breakfast. Lawmakers asked local officials to gather data and collaborate on legislation; several said future bills will seek to balance economic development with stronger oversight of energy and water impacts.
