Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Board Transition topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Little Rock School District honors five departing trustees and outlines transition, onboarding plans

Little Rock School District Board of Education · March 13, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its March 12 meeting the Little Rock School District honored five outgoing trustees with poems, plaques and remarks, and discussed logistics for the incoming seven-member board including officer elections, a draw for staggered terms, and onboarding/training plans.

The Little Rock School District Board of Education opened its March 12 meeting with tributes to five outgoing trustees and a series of farewell remarks, then focused on transition logistics and orientation for the incoming seven-member board.

Presenter Dr. Bridal introduced the recognition segment and invited 'Pam' to read an original poem thanking Evelyn Calloway, Vicky Hatter, Mike Mason, Joyce Wesley and Tony Rose for their service. The board presented plaques and gavels to the honorees and offered brief remarks expressing gratitude and appreciation.

Departing members and colleagues used the public portion of the meeting to reflect on years of service and to thank staff. One speaker highlighted long service by Valerie Hudson, the board clerk, and another read notes honoring retired athletics staff member Eric Jackson for decades of support to student-athletes.

The board then reviewed the draft March 19 agenda for the incoming body, agreeing that the first order of business should be electing officers. Members debated whether contested officer races should use secret ballots or a public roll-call vote; legal counsel explained the statutory process for swearing in new members and described the "holdover" concept for members who remain legally in office until successors are sworn.

Members urged a formalized onboarding and orientation for new trustees. Staff reported incoming members had been invited to a district leadership meeting and suggested moving a broader training presentation to April to allow the new board time to settle in. The board discussed using a public, transparent method (for example, drawing straws or numbers) to assign staggered two- and four-year terms when needed.

The meeting closed with parting advice from several trustees to new members about following protocol, focusing on student data, and taking time to build working relationships. The chair adjourned the meeting with logistical reminders about the March 19 session.