Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Capital Improvement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates SRF award to add secure vestibule at Libby Tozier; staff recommends keeping project in warrant
Summary
Board members split over using SRF funds to add a secure vestibule at Libby Tozier: staff says district share would be about $286,047 with a 10‑year interest‑free loan (roughly $30,000/year); some members prioritize safety and favor a referendum, others urge caution and suggest alternative capital priorities.
Get email alerts on the Capital Improvement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board members spent a substantial portion of the workshop debating whether to proceed with a Secure Rural Schools/State Revolving Fund (SRF)‑eligible secure vestibule project for Libby Tozier elementary school.
Staff described the project and financing: the district’s local share was shown as roughly $286,047, structured as a 10‑year, interest‑free loan with an estimated annual payment around $30,000. "It would be 10 years," staff said. "There’s no penalty if we paid it off early, and it is interest free." Staff also noted the SRF award requires action within six months of the award date, which is why board timing matters.
Supporters framed the proposal as a targeted safety upgrade. One board member said the vestibule provides a transactional window and clearer sight lines to the parking lot, allowing office staff to screen visitors before they enter the main building. "Most of the transaction can happen through that window," the presenter said, pointing to comparable vestibules already in use at other district schools.
Skeptics pushed back on opportunity cost. Several members asked whether the district should instead invest in a roof or an electrical panel upgrade — projects that in some cases carried higher price tags for critical infrastructure. "There seems to be items on here that would be more important than a new vestibule," one member said, citing the roof and panel estimates as examples.
Process and next steps: Board members agreed it was a tough decision and discussed the district’s options if it later reduced building inventory: debt tied to a building typically transfers to the receiving town. The chair sought a show of hands for direction: the consensus was to keep the vestibule proposal in the budget materials and prepare it for a public referendum so taxpayers can decide.
What happens now: Staff will include the SRF vestibule project in the warrant language and bring it forward for a public vote; if approved by voters and the award is accepted, the district would proceed with the SRF loan and contract work.

