Citizen Portal
Sign In

Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows

Selma commission approves gazebo at 106 South Raeford Street

Town of Selma Appearance Commission · March 17, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Following a quasi‑judicial hearing, the commission approved a certificate of appropriateness for a 12-by-20 unpainted-wood accessory structure with a tin roof at 106 South Raeford Street; staff found the proposal consistent with the district.

The Town of Selma Appearance Commission voted on March 16 to approve a certificate of appropriateness for a 12-by-20 accessory structure described as a gazebo at 106 South Raeford Street, a 0.53-acre property owned by Barbetta LLC. Staff recommended approval, saying the materials and design were compatible with the district’s character.

Staff described the proposal: an unpainted-wood structure with wood columns and flooring and a tin roof; limited enclosed material at the top was discussed (transcript references to vinyl at the top). Staff asked the commission to accept testimony and exhibits into the record and to authorize the presiding officer to sign the final order. Staff told the commission it found the proposed work consistent with historic-preservation standards.

Two witnesses spoke in support and described placement and use. Resident Fulton Stanley said the gazebo would be at the back of the property, about 8 to 10 feet off the alley, and intended for public use during events and performances. Fulton Stanley described the structure as “all open” with only the top area having a covering: "It's gonna be all open. The only thing that'll be closed is around the top..." Staff confirmed the applicant, identified in the record as Ron Hester, was present.

After accepting testimony, commissioners reviewed the Historic Preservation Commission findings (consistency with standards, material compatibility and competent evidence). A motion to approve the certificate of appropriateness was made and seconded; the commission voted in favor by voice vote and authorized the presiding officer to sign the final order. The transcript records the outcome as approved; individual vote tallies by member were not recorded in the meeting transcript.