Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Selma appearance commission tables West Elm historic-district map amendments

Town of Selma Appearance Commission · March 17, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The town appearance commission discussed expanding and clarifying district boundaries in West Elm — including possible East and South Selma districts — but tabled action to allow staff and commissioners time to prepare consolidated maps and property-owner notice plans.

The Town of Selma Appearance Commission on March 16 discussed proposed amendments to the West Elm Historic District map, including a proposal to create separate East Selma and South Selma historic districts and clearer dividing lines between districts. The commission did not vote on a map amendment and tabled the discussion until its next meeting so staff and commissioners could prepare consolidated maps and recommendations.

Staff presented edits and said the map is a work in progress; commissioners raised specific boundary questions that included Draper Street, Anderson Street, Richardson Street, Griswold Street and Brevard. Commissioners said they want to avoid a patchwork approach that would “cherry-pick” individual properties and instead prefer clear, contiguous district lines. One commissioner asked how to treat homes that have been rebuilt; staff said those properties could be designated as noncontributing in a district rather than excluded entirely.

Staff described the procedural steps for a map amendment: the appearance commission would forward a recommendation to the planning board; the planning board would make a recommendation and staff would prepare property-owner notices before the item goes to the town council for final action. Commissioners also reported consulting the North Carolina Department of Cultural Resources’ historic-preservation staff for guidance on district boundaries and contributing/noncontributing classifications.

The commission did not take final action and tabled the item. Commissioners asked staff to bring back refined maps and a recommended approach to owner notification and public outreach at a future meeting.