Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the DUI topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Defendant pleads guilty to DUI; judge imposes 12-month term with probation and fines

Clayton County State Court · March 17, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

In case 2023CR00224, Sharita Deshae Lucas pleaded guilty to count 1 (DUI); the court accepted the negotiated plea, credited one day served, sentenced 12 months with the balance probated, ordered a substance evaluation and 40 hours of community service, and imposed fines.

The court accepted a negotiated plea and sentenced Sharita Deshae Lucas in case 2023CR00224 on Monday.

Per the plea agreement, Lucas pleaded guilty to count 1 (DUI—less safe); count 2 was merged into count 1 and another traffic-related count was entered as no contest. The state presented a factual basis describing a single-vehicle accident on Aug. 20, 2022, officers’ observations of impairment (odor of alcohol, slurred speech, glassy eyes), and a post-arrest blood-alcohol content of 0.148.

The state recommended a 12-month sentence with credit for one day already served, and to probate the balance conditioned on completion of a DUI risk-reduction program, a substance-abuse evaluation and any recommended treatment, 40 hours of community service, random testing, and payment of a $300 fine. The court accepted the plea, ordered the recommended disposition, and noted surcharges would increase the total fine to approximately $500; a separate count drew a $200 fine to run concurrent so total fines would be $298 as described on the record.

The judge admonished Lucas about probation reporting obligations and placed her into a probation breakout with the court’s probation expert to review next steps, warning that failure to report is a common source of rearrest. Counsel for the defense indicated readiness to review license implications and to further explain post-plea administrative steps.

The court closed that calendar item after confirming entry of the plea and completion of paperwork.