Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Health topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Yucaipa council OKs staff work to pursue Blue Zones partnership but avoids funding commitment
Summary
The council directed staff to pursue outside funding and develop a plan to implement the Blue Zones community health model, but declined to commit city general‑fund dollars at this time (the $150,000 financial impact was discussed).
The council on March 9 agreed to let staff continue pursuing a Blue Zones community‑wellness partnership while avoiding a direct appropriation from the city’s general fund. Representatives from Blue Zones and the Healthy Yucaipa Committee presented program goals, local pilot results and national outcomes that the organization attributes to policy, environment and community engagement changes.
Ruben Gonzalez, executive director for the Banning Blue Zones Project, described the model’s “power 9” principles—behaviors and policy changes that Blue Zones says are associated with longer, healthier lives—and cited instances where participating cities reported declines in medical claims and other measurable benefits. Robin Jensen of the Healthy Yucaipa Committee told council the committee supports phase 1 and believes Blue Zones can help secure grants and sponsorships.
Council members pressed staff on the financial implications: the staff report listed a possible $150,000 cost for initial implementation but presenters said many cities secure outside sponsorship to cover much of that amount. Councilmembers Woolsey and others voiced concern about committing scarce general‑fund dollars; the motion that passed directed staff to seek outside funding sources and continue planning without obligating city money now. Councilmember Woolsey voted no on the direction because she felt the city insurance programs already provide similar benefits and did not want to pursue the program at this time.
Why it matters: Blue Zones projects touch public health, school and business partnerships and can change policy levers (food, active transport, retailer practices). Council’s decision starts a staff‑driven exploration of external funding and community engagement but does not obligate the city to spend the $150,000 noted in the staff report.
Next steps: Staff will pursue grant and sponsor opportunities, return to council with a funding plan that minimizes general‑fund exposure and report on community interest and potential partners.
