Panel debates expanding survivor benefit in S.89 to include 'ride-along' mental-health workers
Loading...
Summary
Committee members discussed adding licensed mental-health or social-work professionals who ride along with law enforcement to S.89 survivor-benefit eligibility, and reviewed a treasurer's-office amendment to let the board pay evaluation fees from the survivors fund; Tom Abenow (VSEA) confirmed stakeholders and treasurer agree benefits should be prospective, not retroactive.
Committee discussion on S.89 focused on whether to expand survivor-benefit eligibility to include professionals who "ride along" with law enforcement (for example, licensed mental-health workers or social workers) and how to define that group. Elizabeth (S3) raised the point that the role of mental-health professionals accompanying officers has evolved and that, if covered, the bill should recognize their willingness "to place themselves in danger" while performing crisis response.
Definitional and administrative concerns: Members and staff (S7) warned that adding "ride-alongs" creates definitional complexity: who qualifies, whether they must be licensed, and whether the death or injury must occur "in the line of duty" or be the result of an occupation-related illness. S7 presented Draft 1.2 (posted April 3) that breaks the statute into clearer subdivisions and adds treasurer's-office language allowing the board to pay reasonable fees from the emergency personnel survivors benefit fund to evaluate occupation-related illness claims.
Retroactivity: Tom Abenow (S5), identifying himself as VSEA coordinator of external legislative affairs, said the treasurer did not object to clear language making the bill prospective (applying only to deaths occurring after the effective date). The committee asked staff to draft language clarifying prospective application.
Next steps: Staff will show the committee the posted Draft 1.2, incorporate treasurer-office technical language as appropriate, and prepare a prospective effective-date clause for consideration. The committee did not take a formal vote during the session.
