Rules committee advances memo on voucher preference for public employees amid fair-housing concerns
Loading...
Summary
The San Jose Rules Committee voted 5-0 to place on the April 7 council agenda a memo clarifying a low-income voucher preference that could allow qualifying public-safety officers to move ahead in the application queue; Vice Mayor Foley raised concerns about setting aside 50 units for a single employee class.
The San Jose Rules Committee voted unanimously to send to the full City Council a memo clarifying a low-income voucher and equity program that would allow qualifying public employees to receive preference in the application process for affordable housing units.
Chair Cohen described the proposal as a preference — not a strict set-aside — saying the approach would allow qualifying officers in the police department to move to the front of the line but would not reserve units exclusively for them. “...would not set aside units and would allow the units to be rented by anybody who qualifies through that low income voucher and equity program,” Cohen said.
Huascar Castro of Working Partnerships told the committee the organization supports the memo’s approach and commended Councilmember Casey’s original recommendation. Castro said the group appreciates exploring ways to reduce long commutes for public-safety workers and urged staff and council to address potential fair-housing legal hurdles.
Councilmember DeJuan suggested expanding the scope to include San Jose Fire Department staff and teachers; Chair Cohen said scope and any amendments would be considered by the full council on April 7. Councilmember Kamay asked whether a proposal to preferentially move up to 50 police officers would be legally permissible and whether the city could frame the preference for “City of San Jose employees.” Assistant City Attorney Kevin Fisher replied that the specific proposal would need review when formally before council but that, generally, “as long as the preference is not directed or excludes a protected class, generally...would likely pass muster and would be defensible.”
Vice Mayor Foley said she would forward the item to full council for discussion but reiterated an objection to singling out one employee class for a 50-unit preference on fair-housing grounds, urging that preferences not disadvantage protected individuals. The committee voted 5-0 to place the item on the April 7 agenda.
What happens next: the full City Council will consider the memo and any proposed scope changes or amendments at its April 7 meeting. The committee did not adopt a final policy today.
