Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Works topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County weighs bringing trash pickup in-house after contractor signals CPI-based increase
Summary
At a July 28 work session the county manager described potential rate increases from contractor GFL tied to CPI and presented an analysis that bringing residential pickup in-house could save roughly $92,000 annually; staff noted up-front equipment costs and increased operational responsibility if the county assumes service.
Cusseta-Chattahoochee County officials on July 28 discussed possible changes to residential garbage service after the county received notice from contractor GFL of a price adjustment tied to CPI.
County Manager Thomas Weaver told the work session that the county’s current contractor costs for residential pickup have been summarized in county notes as roughly $312,000 per year with a proposed increase to about $342,000 (an approximate 10% change in some county figures). At another point in the staff summary the county referenced a higher figure — $480,137 — in the context of total franchise or residential costs; staff said those numbers reflect different accounting line items and they will verify them.
Weaver said the county has a one-year contract that auto-renews and referred commissioners to the contract language; he said staff are checking whether increases are limited by the contract to CPI or a stated percentage. Weaver presented a county estimate that bringing residential pickup in-house could save about $92,000 annually but would require purchasing at least one truck (SPLOST was mentioned as a potential funding source for equipment) and would create new operational responsibilities for county staff.
Weaver also described enforcement changes at the recycling center that require payment for tires and construction debris; he said contractors and some users had not been paying previously and that the county is putting in payment solutions such as water-bill billing or on-site credit-card processing in the future.
Why it matters: Solid-waste contract changes affect household costs and county budgets. Moving service in-house could lower long-term contractor expenses but requires capital investment and new management capacity.
What’s next: Staff will review contract terms, verify the differing cost figures noted in the work session, and return recommendations to the Commission, including formal contract review and a cost–benefit analysis if commissioners wish to consider an in-house model.
Sources: County Manager’s July 28 work session update; county staff discussion about GFL notice and recycle-center enforcement.
