Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Discipline topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board affirms expulsions and stipulated agreements following closed session
Summary
Following closed session, the Roseville Joint Union High School District board approved multiple expulsion actions and stipulated expulsion agreements (cases 06Dash24Slash25, 07Dash24Slash25, 08Dash2425 and 09Dash24Dash25), with motions reported as carrying unanimously; a public commenter had pleaded with the board not to expel her son.
Get email alerts on the Student Discipline topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Roseville Joint Union High School District Board of Trustees reported votes taken in closed session on May 13 that approved several expulsions and stipulated expulsion agreements.
A motion to approve the expulsion for case number 06Dash24Slash25 was made and seconded and the board recorded the motion as carrying 5-0. The board then approved a stipulated expulsion agreement on case number 07Dash24Slash25, followed by approval of additional stipulated agreements (08Dash2425) and a stability expulsion agreement in case number 09Dash24Dash25; the chair reported motions as carrying unanimously for these items.
Before the vote, a parent who identified herself as a resident addressed the board during public comment to urge the trustees not to expel her son. The resident said she had enrolled her student in an online school and objected to the expulsion, asserting the district and a PE teacher had failed to protect the student during incidents in which other students grabbed or restrained him and that documentation in the file did not reflect the student's disability-related needs. She said, "please like don't expel him," and asked the board to review evidence and consider alternatives.
Board members did not discuss the specific closed-session evidence in open session. The board recorded motions and outcomes for the items and moved on to other agenda business. The expulsion motions were reported as carried in each instance; the board did not provide additional details about alternative placements or appeal rights during the open session report.
The resident noted the student is now enrolled in an online school and asked that the board avoid placing an expulsion on the student's permanent record. The board's public report of the closed-session votes did not include additional conditions or next steps for the cases beyond the approval of expulsions and stipulated agreements.

