Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Environment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Palo Alto adopts bird-friendly building standards with exemptions and alternative compliance
Summary
After wide public comment and several amendments, the council adopted a bird-friendly design ordinance that requires bird-safe treatments for new construction and major remodels in defined areas, allows alternative compliance (decals/films approved by standards), and includes specified exemptions (residential under 35 ft in parts of the city, airport operations, ground-floor retail in overlay areas).
The Palo Alto City Council adopted a bird-friendly building design ordinance March 16 with modifications to staff'recommended language and exemptions after extended public testimony and commission review.
Planner Kelly Cha described the ordinance'scope: it applies to new construction, major remodels (defined as replacement of 50% or more of certain exterior elements over a three-year period) and "bird-hazard" installations such as glass railings. The ordinance defines a bird-sensitive area (roughly East of Highway 101 and West of Foothill Expressway) and requires a percentage of each elevation to incorporate bird-friendly treatments. Staff presented three treatment families: permanently integrated visual cues (dots or lines spaced no more than two inches apart), architecturally integrated exterior features (screens) and an alternative compliance path that may include patterned decals or films.
The draft included exemptions to reduce burdens on small-scale residential remodeling and ground-floor retail in downtown and California Avenue overlay districts. After public speakers and organizations urged a stronger ordinance and developers and local business groups requested more study or relief, council debated changes including whether to expand the residential 35'foot exemption and whether to allow films/decals for nonresidential projects. Council adopted the staff recommendation as modified: staff was directed to allow decals or films as an alternative for qualifying nonresidential applications (with standards comparable to American Bird Conservancy guidance or equivalent), to add an exemption for airport operations and to include a green-roof proximity provision (treatments required within 15 feet of green roofs). A proposed amendment to exempt residential glazing above 75 feet failed.
The ordinance will return for second reading as a consent item and will take effect 30 days after that adoption. Staff said alternative treatments will be required to be applied to the exterior surface where feasible and that annual monitoring and implementation guidance will follow.
