Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget Surplus topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Oswego trustees coalesce on 2% levy cut, punt detailed grocery-tax/water-credit decision for follow-up meeting

Village of Oswego 3 Committee of the Whole (budget workshop) · October 25, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After extended discussion of a projected roughly $1 million surplus, trustees agreed by consensus to include a 2% reduction in the 2026 property-tax levy in the draft budget and directed staff to continue studying options to use grocery-tax revenue to offset water-rate increases (one option under review: a roughly $600,000 program that would translate to an approximately $8-per-bill credit) and other priorities such as a modest senior-center increase.

Finance Director Andrea told trustees the village was projecting a roughly $1,000,000 general-fund surplus in the 2026 draft budget and outlined several options for its use: transfer to capital, an increased contribution to the senior center, a one-time resident utility credit (estimated at $50 per account) or a recurring credit built into water bills using grocery-tax proceeds, or additional payment to the police pension fund to reduce the unfunded liability. She emphasized timing constraints around the property-tax levy but said the larger surplus-allocation debate could be continued when more precise figures are available.

"The budget as it's presented assumes a 2% rate decrease," Andrea said, showing a levy scenario and the fiscal trade-offs of any additional change. Trustees asked how changes would affect the police pension contribution, bond sizing, water-bill impacts and public perception.

Trustee Novy expressed fiscal prudence: "I do not think we should touch our levy this year... I wanna make sure the police pension is going to be funded." Trustee Koenig and Trustee Hughes favored a visible tax-rate reduction for resident optics; Trustee Koenig noted that a modest rate decrease could signal the board is listening to residents. After broad discussion the board reached an operational consensus to include a 2% reduction in the property-tax levy in the draft and to hold a detailed follow-up on the grocery-tax/water-credit options at a Committee of the Whole or staff-reports session on Nov. 4.

Staff outlined options for applying grocery-tax revenue, which staff estimated could provide roughly $1,000,000 a year, and presented an estimate that using $600,000 to fund a water-bill credit would translate to a small per-bill credit (Andrea and trustees discussed a rough $8-per-bill figure as an example). Trustees discussed competing priorities (debt service, capital fund, senior-services) and the communications challenge of explaining any temporary credit versus a long-term change.

No final appropriation was adopted at the Oct. 25 session; trustees directed staff to return with a narrower set of options and detailed fiscal modeling for the Nov. 4 discussion.

Action recorded at the meeting: the board approved a procedural motion at the start to allow Trustee Jack Cooper to attend electronically (roll call recorded).