Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the FOIA And SCACC Concerns topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board denies FOIA appeal related to SCACC records as public commenters urge changes at animal control
Summary
The Board voted to deny a FOIA appeal and uphold the county’s charge for records related to Rachel Horton and Saginaw County Animal Care & Control; residents used public comment to raise concerns about SCACC staffing, remote work, alleged inefficient spending and lawsuits.
Get email alerts on the FOIA And SCACC Concerns topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Saginaw County Board of Commissioners on March 17 voted to deny an appeal of a FOIA request related to records about Rachel Horton and Saginaw County Animal Care & Control (SCACC), and several residents used the public comment period to press the Board on SCACC operations.
By motion, the Board approved sending written notice to appellant Jamie Geesey denying her FOIA appeal and upholding the county’s cost for responding to the February 10, 2026 request. The roll call recorded seven Yes votes (Commissioners Mark S. Piotrowski; Sheldon Matthews; Tracey L. Slodowski; Denny M. Harris; Gerald D. Little; Michael A. Webster; and Jack B. Tany), one No (Lisa R. Coney), one Abstain (Richard A. Spitzer) and two absences (Christopher S. Boyd; John L. Kaczynski).
During Audiences, several residents raised concerns about Saginaw County Animal Care & Control. Kimberly Trinklein told the Board she had spoken with Administrator Hannah and objected to SCACC personnel working remotely. Paul Glazar alleged funds had been spent inefficiently and requested more volunteers at the shelter. Heidi Storck cited lawsuits involving SCACC and argued for improved staff training. Sue Persinger brought a handout and voiced complaints about the SCACC director.
The transcript records the public comments and the Board’s FOIA action; no further formal directive to staff concerning SCACC operations appears in the minutes. The FOIA action was taken following the County Civil Counsel’s legal opinion as presented to the Board.
