Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Defense urges Washington Supreme Court to adopt objective "bad faith" test after jail tape overwritten
Summary
In State v. Yeager, defense counsel asked the Washington Supreme Court to treat government "bad faith" objectively and to dismiss convictions with prejudice after jail surveillance footage that might have been exculpatory was overwritten; the state urged retaining a subjective standard. The court submitted the case for decision.
SEATTLE — The Washington State Supreme Court heard arguments Thursday in State of Washington v. Rodney Joseph Yeager over whether prosecutors and law enforcement should be held to an objective standard of "bad faith" when potentially exculpatory evidence is destroyed.
Maya Ramakrishnan, counsel for petitioner Rodney Yeager, told the justices that "when the government destroys evidence in its possession before anyone gets a chance to see it, it is almost impossible for the accused to prove the government's subjective motivations for doing so." She asked the court to "clarify that bad faith should be determined objectively based on the information available to the government at the time that the evidence is destroyed" and to reverse the Court of Appeals and dismiss Yeager's convictions with prejudice because a jail video was overwritten despite "multiple objective reasons to know that the evidence had potential exculpatory value."
Ramarkrishnan argued the defense bears…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
