Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Measure Dd Roads topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Cloverdale council prioritizes roads for Measure DD funds and orders immediate cost estimates for top streets
Summary
Council agreed on a draft allocation that directs 75% of Measure DD revenue to roads, with smaller shares for parks, public safety and maintenance; staff was told to use $977,004 on hand for immediate projects and to return with cost estimates for priority sections including 1st Street, Hillview and Tarmon/Mayer/ Rosewood.
The Cloverdale City Council reviewed Measure DD revenue projections and multiyear bonding scenarios and gave staff direction to prioritize local street repairs while preserving a small ongoing maintenance allocation.
Public Works Director Derek (speaker 22) presented scenarios for 10‑, 15‑ and 20‑year bonding plans and noted staff used a baseline assumption of $900,000 annually from Measure DD for debt service in the consultant model. Council debated the tradeoffs: longer bonds produce more upfront project dollars but reduce available DD money for other uses for many years; pay‑as‑you‑go avoids interest costs but extends the schedule for major projects.
After public comment that urged focusing on streets and caution about incurring debt, the council indicated majority support for a pie‑chart allocation that reserves roughly 75% for road projects, with the remainder for parks, public safety and ongoing pothole/maintenance. Council members emphasized using the current $977,004 in DD revenues to start tangible projects and directed staff to return quickly with ballpark cost estimates for specific priorities so the city can issue RFPs or place a budget amendment on the April 8 consent calendar. Council and staff identified immediate priorities: 1st Street (Main to Boulevard) and the small Franklin section to be done concurrently, Hillview Drive, and a cluster of smaller reconstructs in the Tarmon/Mayer/ Rosewood area.
Several council members also asked for local contractor estimates to test the PTAB projections and to minimize repeated mobilization costs; staff agreed to solicit informal quotes from a bidders list and return with numbers before moving to any bonding decision.
What’s next: staff will provide specific cost estimates for the top priority sections, details on how the $977,004 could be deployed immediately, and an updated recommendation about whether, and on what term, to bond in a future meeting.
