Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Village planner proposes outdoor‑lighting code to curb glare and set inspection standards

Village of Antioch Board of Trustees · January 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Planning staff introduced a text amendment to Antioch’s zoning code that would set foot‑candle limits, maximum fixture heights, rules for electronic display brightness, inspection procedures and a phased approach to enforcing nonconforming existing fixtures.

Planning staff presented a draft text amendment to the village zoning code that would regulate outdoor lighting across residential, commercial, institutional and industrial areas. The proposed ordinance adds definitions, sets illumination limits (measured in foot‑candles), caps fixture heights, outlines exemptions and creates an inspection and variance process for both new installations and problematic existing fixtures.

Howard Capari, a planner who identified himself to the board, described the ordinance’s phased enforcement approach: fixtures lawfully installed before the ordinance’s effective date would not be required to be replaced immediately; enforcement would be triggered if fixtures are replaced, altered, or deemed a nuisance to adjoining properties. "All outdoor lighting fixtures lawfully installed prior to the effective date of this ordinance will be exempt unless replaced or determined to be a nuisance," he said.

The ordinance would also set maximum nighttime brightness for digital displays and electronic message boards (nighttime thresholds as low as 40 nits in the draft) and would discourage floodlighting and uncontrolled uplighting. Staff said the code would allow exemptions for safety and public‑interest lighting and include a process for property owners to request variances.

Trustees raised concerns about commercial impacts and the practicality of enforcement. One trustee cited large, older commercial lighthouses (for example at the big‑box retail sites) and asked whether a full parking‑lot renovation should trigger lighting review; staff said commercial projects that undergo resurfacing or site renovation would be reviewed under building/zoning permits so enforcement would occur in the normal course of redevelopment.

Staff also said they expect to acquire calibrated light‑meters to support inspections and proposed gradual enforcement to allow time for businesses and residents to come into compliance. The board moved the amendment forward for further review and asked staff to provide more detail about enforcement timelines and budget for equipment.