Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Option Sales Tax topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Maplewood council hears staff briefing on possible half-cent sales tax to fund regional projects
Summary
City staff told the council a half-cent local option sales tax could raise roughly $3.8M–$4.5M annually and support $60M–$70M in borrowing for regionally significant projects such as a community center, nature center and public safety training facility; council set an internal Jan. 26 deadline to decide whether to pursue legislative authorization.
Get email alerts on the Local Option Sales Tax topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff on Nov. 24 briefed Maplewood’s City Council on using a half-cent local option sales tax to pay for regionally significant capital projects, providing revenue estimates, the legislative path required and a January schedule for a potential decision.
Mike Sabol, the city presenter, told the council a University of Minnesota Extension analysis in the meeting packet identified about $765 million in Maplewood taxable sales and estimated nonresidents account for roughly 60% of those sales. "A half-cent sales tax would generate about $3,800,000 in 2023 numbers," Sabol said, adding the analysts forecast about $4.5 million by 2026 and noted online-sales collections could raise that figure by about 10–15%.
Sabol described how the tool works and its limits: legislative authorization is required, followed by a voter referendum on a ballot question that must specify project(s), amounts and duration. He said jurisdictions may place between one and five ballot questions and that "if you do ask one question and it fails, then the answer is no," meaning a single failure can stop the package. Sabol also said a dollar amount set for a project cannot be transferred to other projects if a separate question fails; instead the tax would simply collect for fewer years.
Council members pressed staff on details. Council Member Cave asked whether the city should place multiple questions on the ballot and whether funds from a failed question could go to projects that passed; Sabol said the structure and number of questions are policy choices but that Minnesota rules constrain reallocations. Mayor Mary Abrams and Council Member Lee said they viewed the tax as a way to reduce pressure on property taxes and to capture spending by nonresidents who use Maplewood facilities.
Council members and staff identified three candidate projects that they said most clearly meet the "regionally significant" standard: the YMCA community center, the nature center and a public safety training facility. Mayor Abrams said the public safety training facility already has a project estimate the council has discussed and that the city is pursuing state bonding and awaiting potential federal funding. "We have to show that we are committed to this," she said, describing a local revenue commitment as supportive of legislative bonding requests.
On financing, Sabol said the $4.5 million-per-year revenue forecast could support roughly $60 million–$70 million in borrowing depending on interest rates and issuance costs. He noted the maximum legal duration for a local option sales tax in Minnesota is 20 years and explained retailers and the Department of Revenue need about 90 days' notice to implement a new tax rate; as a practical matter, a successful November referendum would typically produce an April 1 start date the following year.
Sabol told council members the administrative role for the city would mainly be pre-election public information (town halls, informational materials) rather than campaign advocacy; legal limits bar the city from saying "vote for" or "vote against" a ballot question in official communications. He said staff would notify the House and Senate tax committee chairs if the council decided to pursue authorization, and recommended the council make a decision at or before its Jan. 26 meeting so the city can meet the Jan. 31 timeline for legislative notification.
The council did not take policy action on the LOST itself at the Nov. 24 meeting. Staff said they will provide additional written materials in late December and resume discussion in early January; the council adjourned the workshop with no referral or formal direction recorded.
