Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance Procedures topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning advisory board rejects switching to Rosenberg’s rules, debates procedural clarity and holds leadership nominations
Summary
Board member Alex proposed switching from Robert’s Rules to Rosenberg’s Rules to simplify motions; the board rejected the change after public comment and debate, then held nominations for chair and vice chair (nominations carried by voice vote).
Board member Alex proposed that the Kissimmee Planning Advisory Board adopt Rosenberg’s Rules of Order, arguing they are shorter and easier for a small board to apply. Alex distributed a written motion and handouts comparing Robert’s Rules and Rosenberg’s Rules and told the board ‘‘confusion is a weapon but clarity is a shield’’ in arguing for the change.
Alex and supporters said Rosenberg’s simplifies procedures, limits the number of concurrent motions and allows "friendly amendments" that accept edits by consensus. City staff and several board members cautioned that any local rule must comply with city code and Florida law; staff reminded the board that Florida Statute 286.012 governs abstentions and that boards cannot abstain from votes except when a conflict of interest exists. Staff also noted the planning board may adopt its own rules of procedure under city code section 2‑211.
Public commenter Julius urged clarity and local customization, saying many boards adopt written local procedures and that courtesy between motion makers and those proposing amendments reduces confusion.
After debate and questions about uniformity with other municipal bodies, a motion to adopt Rosenberg’s Rules (moved by Alex and seconded as recorded) was put to a vote and defeated (chair announced the motion was defeated).
Later in the meeting members discussed gaps in the minutes and an unposted recording from a prior meeting; Alex said he filed a public‑records request after the city commission’s packet did not reflect the advisory board’s unanimous recommendation on a separate item (Yates Road). Staff said provisional minutes and audio access would be clarified.
The board then moved to nominations. A nomination for chair (transcript records a nomination of "Robert Bussier") was made and seconded; the chair called for a voice vote and announced the nomination carried. For vice chair, a nomination recorded in the transcript is "Alex Alimi;" that nomination was seconded and carried by voice vote. The board adjourned after the votes; members suggested a future workshop on rules of order and sunshine law training for new members.
Outcome and next steps: The board rejected the proposal to adopt Rosenberg’s Rules. The board held nominations and voice votes for leadership; official minutes and the clerk’s record will provide the definitive, named outcome in the public record.
