Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Public Comment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public commenters press Detroit council on housing, homelessness and election fraud allegations
Summary
Callers at the Detroit City Council’s public‑comment period urged action on housing and homelessness—blaming mass foreclosures and the assessor—and several callers alleged absentee‑ballot fraud and urged legal action; council did not take immediate policy votes on those claims.
Public commenters began the council meeting by urging urgent action on housing and homelessness and by airing allegations about election irregularities.
At the start of the session a caller who identified community concerns about “housing justice” said the Detroit Reparations Task Force recommendations address housing and accused the city of mass overtaxation and widespread foreclosures, arguing those practices are a primary cause of homelessness and calling for the removal of Chief Assessor Alvin Horn. The caller also urged community representation on the Charles H. Wright Museum board.
Another caller, identifying themself as “Mister Rue,” alleged absentee‑ballot fraud in Detroit “over the last decade” and said pastor Lorenzo Tull and Ramon Jackson would present affidavits in Washington, D.C.; the caller said lawsuits would follow and named local election‑office employees they described as corrupt. The caller’s remarks were presented as allegations; the city and the officials named did not respond during the public‑comment period.
During the same public comment block, Tara Brown urged the council to demand accountability for shelter conditions and spending, saying one shelter had failed inspections despite receiving large funding (the caller stated the shelter was given "$387,100,000 dollars"). Brown said she had requested follow‑up from staff and had not received a response. Another caller pressed the council for police accountability after a shooting and urged the council to rescind contracts they called unlawful.
The council took no formal action on the allegations or the oversight requests during the comment period; the clerk closed public comment and noted that remarks would be placed on the public record if callers could not complete them.
