Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Germantown planners discuss how to count 'multifamily' and whether to track owner vs. renter

Village of Germantown Plan Commission · March 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioners reviewed baseline housing counts and debated whether to track single‑family vs. multifamily by building type or to track owner‑occupied versus rental occupancy; staff will return with refined tables and recommendations for monitoring the village housing mix.

Commissioners spent an extended portion of the March 9 meeting discussing how the village should define and track its housing mix — whether by structural type (single‑family detached/attached versus multifamily) or by occupancy (owner‑occupied versus rental) — and how those choices affect policy discussions about future development.

Staff presented baseline dwelling unit counts (8,619 units as of 01/01/2024) and two candidate tables: one that records single‑family vs. multifamily structural types and another that cross‑tabs owner vs. renter for both structural types. Commissioners observed that structural type alone can be misleading (for example, owner‑occupied condominiums appear as multifamily in structural tallies but are owner‑occupied in practice) and that ownership data are difficult to verify without county or census cross‑checks.

Several commissioners and staff noted that the village cannot legally condition approvals solely on whether units will be renter‑occupied, though design and lot‑size standards can influence likely occupancy models. Commissioners asked staff to pursue additional data work with the county assessor and other sources and to return with a recommendation and refined tables — including a practical, readily‑maintainable reporting format that could be provided for each new residential project.

No policy change was adopted; the commission asked staff to refine the approach so the planning commission and village board can more easily assess the long‑term effect of proposed projects on the village housing mix, school enrollment projections and infrastructure planning.