Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board of Adjustment approves conditional uses to recognize long‑running salvage yards on Border Street, contingent on rezoning
Summary
The Escambia County Board of Adjustment unanimously approved two conditional‑use requests that would bring long‑standing salvage yard operations on Border Street into compliance, with final effect contingent on an upcoming rezoning to HCLI by the Board of County Commissioners.
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Escambia County Board of Adjustment on March 18 approved two conditional‑use requests to formalize decades‑old salvage yard operations along Border Street, with approval contingent on the county’s pending rezoning to an HCLI designation.
Meredith Bush, the applicants’ agent and an attorney, told the board that the sites have been used for salvage activities for “20, 30 years, if not greater,” and that staff supports the applications. “Staff supports our request,” Bush said, and noted the approvals would depend on the Board of County Commissioners completing a rezoning process.
Andrew Homer, Development Services staff, recommended approval and described the presentation materials the board reviewed, including a 500‑foot radius map, zoning and future land‑use designations and aerial photographs. Homer said the request is “basically cleaning up what should have been resolved back in the early nineties” and that bringing the existing operations into code compliance is the objective.
Staff told the board the parcels sit in areas with mixed industrial and commercial uses and lie within a community redevelopment overlay; the rezoning to HCLI and required screening and buffering would be evaluated through site‑plan review. Homer also noted wellhead protection contours (7‑ and 20‑year travel time) and said the proposal includes measures to avoid new nuisances, lighting or signage impacts.
Board members questioned whether an extended period of unpermitted operation can be treated as evidence of compliance. The applicant and staff responded that longstanding, documented use can support a lawful nonconforming (grandfathered) status and that the present process is intended to regularize the sites and require any necessary site‑plan changes.
A board member moved to accept staff findings and recommendation for each case; both motions were seconded and passed unanimously by voice vote.
The approvals are conditioned on the county’s rezoning action to HCLI and on the applicants completing any required permits, screening, buffer plantings and site‑plan changes during subsequent review.

