Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Criminal Law topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate approves felony for intentionally damaging emergency vehicles; debate centered on defining "temporary" unavailability
Summary
Senate Bill 232 passed March 26 to make intentional damage to authorized emergency vehicles a class F felony when damage equals or exceeds $5,000 or renders the unit temporarily unable to respond; floor debate focused on what "temporarily unavailable" means and prosecutors’ discretion. Vote: 17 yes, 3 no, 1 absent.
Senate Bill 232, which creates a class F felony for intentionally damaging an authorized emergency vehicle when loss equals or exceeds $5,000 or the damage temporarily prevents response, passed the Senate on March 26 following an extended floor debate about the meaning of “temporarily unavailable.”
Sponsor Senator Wilson described the Greenwood 2023 incident where rocks damaged fire apparatus during an active response and said the proposal recognizes that impairing response capability itself is a serious public‑safety harm. The bill creates a class F felony for such conduct and clarifies that "authorized emergency vehicle" includes fire apparatus, ambulances, law‑enforcement vehicles and other emergency craft.
Several senators raised concerns about the statutory phrase "temporarily unavailable," asking whether a flat tire or a single broken window could trigger a felony charge and whether courts or prosecutors would decide charging thresholds. Sgt. Mike Rippel of the Delaware State Police testified that "temporary" had not been defined in case law and that in the Greenwood example an apparatus was out of service for weeks; he said law enforcement supports the bill but recognized definitional concerns.
Mark Cetrona of the Division of Legislative Services advised that because "temporary" is not currently defined in the criminal code, a court would look to common meaning and legislative intent; he said floor debate and the bill’s synopsis would assist in judicial interpretation, and that an amendment could be used if the body wanted a clearer statutory definition. Senators stressed prosecutorial discretion and juvenile handling in family court as mitigation for cases involving minors.
After debate and witness testimony, the Senate passed the bill by a roll call of 17 yes, 3 no and 1 absent. Sponsors said the Department of Justice and Delaware State Police support the concept but recommended careful drafting to ensure the statute targets intentional, substantial interference with emergency response.
