Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezoning 1253 A1A topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Satellite Beach Planning advisory board recommends against rezoning 1253 A1A near Park Avenue beach access
Summary
The Planning and Advisory Board voted to recommend against changing 1253 A1A from residential mixed-use (RM-3) to commercial after residents and board members raised safety, parking and precedent concerns; the applicant did not attend the meeting.
Get email alerts on the Rezoning 1253 A1A topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Satellite Beach Planning and Advisory Board voted to recommend that the City Council not amend the comprehensive plan or rezone 1253 A1A from RM-3 (residential mixed use) to commercial, board members said at their meeting.
Planning staff told the board the property at 1253 A1A has functioned as a commercial use for years and is a nonconforming commercial operation in an RM-3 zone, but that the parcel is very small and limited by parking and site-plan requirements. Chair said the board can either recommend conversion, remain silent (leaving the zoning residential) or ask the applicant to appear at a later meeting.
Neighbors who spoke urged the board to deny a rezoning. “Pertaining to the property located at 1253 A1A I’m requesting on behalf of the residents that the property zoning is not altered,” said Russell Green, a Park Avenue neighbor, who cited pedestrian safety near the beach access, precedent and lack of community support. Stephanie Hill, representing nearby homeowners, told the board there are multiple available commercial lots a short distance away and said extra business traffic would worsen already-limited beach parking.
Daniel Genovese, who said permitting records show a commercial permit for the site in 1993, told the board he feared larger, more intrusive redevelopment if the parcel is rezoned. Staff and members noted that while RM-3 technically allows structures up to 65 feet, the lot’s size and parking constraints make intensive redevelopment unlikely; they also noted that if the building were destroyed in a storm, rebuilding would have to conform to RM-3 standards.
With the applicant absent, a board member moved that the board not recommend the change; another member seconded the motion. The board recorded verbal “Aye” votes and the motion passed. Chair said the board will forward its recommendation to the City Council; the vote does not itself change zoning.
The board’s conversation emphasized three recurring points: the property’s long-standing nonconforming commercial use, immediate neighborhood safety and parking near the Park Avenue beach access, and the potential precedent created by approving a rezoning for a small, pedestrian-oriented parcel. The board said there is no urgency to make a decision and that the applicant could be asked to appear at a future meeting to answer residents’ questions.
What happens next: The board’s recommendation will be transmitted to City Council for its consideration; council action would be required to change the comp plan or zoning.
