Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission approves Summerhill amendment to add 18 units at 30 Ingold Road
Summary
The commission approved a second amendment to the 30 Ingold Road mixed‑use project that increases residential units from 302 to 320 and raises below‑market‑rate units from 45 to 50; Summerhill representatives said mechanical parking and minor envelope changes would accommodate the added units and a supplemental CEQA analysis found no change to prior conclusions.
The Burlingame Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve an amendment to the 30 Ingold Road (Summerhill) project that adds 18 units to an existing approved development, increasing the total from 302 to 320 units and raising below‑market‑rate units from 45 to 50.
Richard Norris, director of development for Summerhill Apartment Communities, told the commission the change responds to recent state density‑bonus changes and requires only a minimal expansion of the building envelope. Brenna of BDE Architecture outlined the changes: infill of unit gaps on Floors 3 and above, conversion of a former low roof to livable space on Floor 7 (adding six units on that level), and parking increases from 358 to 380 stalls using stacker and pallet‑slider systems. The team said they can maintain code‑compliant parking ratios within the existing garage footprint.
Staff described a supplemental environmental analysis that concluded the proposed changes would not alter the earlier CEQA findings (class 32 categorical exemption). Commissioners asked about backup power for mechanical parking systems and courtyard shading; the applicant said stacker manufacturers can remediate issues quickly and that the pool area will be heated and the courtyard dimensions meet courtyard width guidance.
Commissioner Seay moved to approve the amendment with conditions outlined in the staff report; Commissioner Pfaff seconded. The motion passed 7‑0. Staff reminded the public that the commission’s action is appealable to the City Council within the standard period.
