Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Board Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chino Valley board unanimously adopts two legislative resolutions and approves interim budget and developer-fee changes
Summary
On March 9 the Chino Valley Unified board voted 5–0 to adopt resolutions supporting AB 1998 and AB 2365, approved the 2025–26 second interim financial report with positive certification, and adopted a resolution changing statutory developer fees; a public hearing on the district's initial bargaining proposal to CSEA was noticed.
The Chino Valley Unified School District Board of Education recorded a series of unanimous actions on March 9.
- Resolution 2025-2026-37 (in support of AB 1998, Castillo) — Adopted, vote 5–0. The resolution supports AB 1998, which the agenda described as proposing changes to statutory definitions and access to intimate spaces within business establishments.
- Resolution 2025-2026-38 (in support of AB 2365, Sanchez) — Adopted, vote 5–0. The resolution supports AB 2365, which the agenda described as amendments to the Education Code to expand the statutory definition of "egregious misconduct" and strengthen dismissal standards related to certain serious criminal offenses.
- Second interim financial report (2025–26) — Approved, vote 5–0. The board authorized the president of the board and the superintendent to sign the positive certification of financial condition for the current and two subsequent fiscal years.
- Resolution 2025-2026-33 (developer fees) — Adopted, vote 5–0. The board opened and closed the required public hearing regarding proposed changes to statutory developer fees for new residential and commercial/industrial construction under Education Code 17620 and Government Code 65995, then adopted the resolution.
- Public hearing: initial bargaining proposal to the California School Employees Association (CSEA), chapters 102 — Notice provided and hearing closed; no action beyond notice.
Ending: All recorded votes for the listed motions were 5–0; the meeting moved to consent and then to board comments and adjournment.
