Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Committee Votes topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Votes at a glance: Election‑law executive session recommendations and roll‑call outcomes
Summary
The House Election Law Committee moved many bills in executive session — most were recommended Inexpedient to Legislate (ITL) or placed on the consent calendar after roll‑call votes. The committee recorded several unanimous or near‑unanimous ITL recommendations and a handful of contested outcomes.
The House Election Law Committee conducted a lengthy executive session in which it considered numerous election‑related bills and constitutional amendments. Members called roll on motions to recommend "Inexpedient to Legislate" (ITL), majority reports and some "ought to pass" recommendations. Select outcomes recorded in the session include:
• House Bill 15‑20 (defining citizenship for voting purposes): motion for Inexpedient to Legislate carried on a recorded vote of 15–0; the bill was placed on the consent calendar.
• House Bill 11‑06 (public disclosure of a candidate’s citizenship): motion for Inexpedient to Legislate carried on a recorded vote of 15–0; placed on consent.
• House Bill 12‑55 FN (removing higher evidentiary requirements for corruption claims): motion for Inexpedient to Legislate carried 15–0; placed on consent calendar.
• House Bill 14‑62: motion for Inexpedient to Legislate carried 14–1; placed on consent calendar.
• House Bill 14‑29 FN (pausing ballot counting in certain circumstances): motion for Inexpedient to Legislate carried 16–0; placed on consent calendar.
• CACR 14 (constitutional amendment on citizenship for office): reported out "ought to pass" on a recorded roll of 10–6.
• CACR 21 (voter eligibility amendment, as amended): reported out "ought to pass" as amended on a vote of 10–6.
• House Bill 10‑83 FN (disclosure of sources for large political donations): motion for Inexpedient to Legislate passed 9–8.
• House Bill 12‑01 (donor disclosure for certain political committees): committee recommended "Inexpedient to Legislate" on a vote of 9–8.
Many additional bills were discussed and recorded during the session; clerks will publish the committee report that contains full roll‑call tallies and named reports. The committee placed several bills on the consent calendar when motions carried without objection.
The roll calls reflect a range of outcomes from unanimous ITL recommendations to closely divided votes on donor disclosure and constitutional amendment measures. Committee members said some ITL recommendations were based on fiscal notes, constitutional concerns or lack of testimony at public hearing.
The committee did not enact statutes during the meeting; it recorded committee recommendations and placeholders for majority/minority reports to be drafted before floor consideration.
