Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Settlements Indemnification topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee advances multiple city settlements and indemnifications, consolidates police representation items
Summary
The Internal Operations Committee moved several settlement and indemnification items to formal consideration or approved them with no objections, including a $60,000 settlement for Kenneth Mann and consolidated representation for multiple police-related lawsuits.
The Detroit City Council Internal Operations Committee advanced a series of legal settlements and indemnification requests during its meeting, moving multiple items to formal consideration with recommendations to approve and approving others without objection.
The committee moved a resolution authorizing settlement for Kenneth Mann v. City of Detroit in the amount of $60,000 (line item 7.1) after a motion and no objections. A separate item, LaVaughn Hill v. City of Detroit (line item 7.2), involving a proposed $4,000 settlement, was held for one week at the Law Department's request to answer outstanding council questions.
The committee approved a $15,000 case-evaluation amount in Eric Lloyd v. Auto Club Group Insurance Company (line item 7.3) and consolidated multiple items (7.4, 7.7, 7.8, 7.9, 7.10 and 7.12) that authorize legal representation and indemnification for police officers. Graham Anderson of the Law Department summarized that the department and Detroit Police Department judged the officers' actions to be in "good faith," a statement committee members cited when moving the bundle to formal with a recommendation to approve.
Other items moved to formal with recommendations or approval included Transportation-related settlements: McCann ($255,000, line item 7.14), Navit Solutions LLC/Rapid Rx ($2,861, line item 7.15), Bloomfield Hills Surgery Center LLC ($25,000, line item 7.16), Ronald Cross ($45,000, line item 7.17) and Damon Ash ($67,500, line item 7.18). The committee also combined line items 7.6 and 7.11 where appropriate and approved routine motions to send items to formal consideration where no objections were raised.
For one matter—line item 7.13 involving potential representation for Sergeant Orlando Dovine Harper in Bessie Yvonne Stewart v. City of Detroit—the Law Department requested a bring-back at a date to be determined and indicated the matter may be scheduled for closed session for reasons not detailed in the public record.
Several items were deferred for administrative follow-up: Line item 6.2 about Tennis Rights Commission appointments was brought back in three weeks; a policy item concerning AI and Oracle system policies (councilmember Gabriela Santiago Romero's memorandum) was directed to the appropriate department and will be returned at a date to be determined.
The committee's actions during the meeting forwarded settlement payments and representation recommendations for further consideration at formal session; the transcript shows no roll-call vote tallies for items described as "hearing no objection," which the chair treated procedurally as approved or moved to formal with recommendation to approve.
