Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tax Levy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Maywood trustees approve staff—s 5% levy recommendation for upcoming hearings

Village of Maywood Board of Trustees · April 1, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Village of Maywood board voted 4— 3 Nov. 17 to approve staff—s 5% property tax levy recommendation as an estimate for upcoming public hearings after a failed motion to reject the increase; the resolution remains an estimate to be considered at a Dec. 1 public hearing and possible adoption later.

The Village of Maywood Board of Trustees voted Nov. 17 to approve staff—s recommended 5% increase to the village—s 2020 real estate tax levy for purposes of upcoming hearings.

Finance Director Lanya Satchell told trustees the 5% recommendation reflects essential village needs and that the village is operating with a deficit; she framed the figure as an estimate to carry forward to the public hearing process. Trustee N. Booker moved to reject the 5% recommendation outright; that motion failed on a roll call vote of 1 in favor, 6 opposed. Trustee I. Brandon then moved to approve staff—s recommendation for consideration at the upcoming meetings; the motion passed 4— 3.

Mayor Edwenna Perkins and Trustees I. Brandon, M. Jones and K. Wellington voted in favor of forwarding the 5% estimate to the hearing; Trustees A. Sanchez, M. Lightford and N. Booker voted no. Village Attorney Michael Jurusik confirmed the approved resolution is only an estimate and said a formal public hearing on the levy is scheduled for Dec. 1, 2020; any final levy would follow statutory notice and hearing procedures.

The board—s action sets the preliminary levy figure for public review; it does not itself impose a tax increase. The next procedural steps noted during the meeting are the Dec. 1 public hearing and subsequent board consideration in accordance with state law.