Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Funding Formula topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Consultants lay out foundation‑formula concepts and how Montana's approach maps to national practices
Summary
Consultants from APA walked the commission through common foundation formula components — base/foundation amounts, student weights (at‑risk, English learners, special education), district adjustments (size, sparsity, cost) — and explained state/local share designs. They highlighted Montana’s mix of categorical funds, local levies, and per‑A/B/basic entitlements.
Consultants from the American Institutes (APA) presented a primer on foundation funding formulas used by many states, explaining how jurisdictions calculate a base ‘foundation’ amount and layer student characteristic weights (economically disadvantaged, English learners, special education) and district characteristics (size adjustments, sparsity, regional cost indices).
They described tradeoffs in formula design: whether to provide categorical grants versus weights inside the formula, how local levies and equalization affect state share, and the implications of different measurement choices (property wealth vs income). APA noted Montana already includes many of those adjustments but mixes categorical funds with per‑pupil entitlements and basic entitlements that produce implicit size and grade‑span adjustments.
Commissioners probed technical points — whether weights are stacked or capped, how to measure ability to pay, and how to treat high‑cost special‑education cases — and consultants agreed additional analysis is needed to quantify dollar effects for Montana.
