Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Voter Registration topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

House committee advances measure to let withdrawal forms update a candidate's voter address

House Elections and Apportionment Committee · February 4, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Senate Bill 112 would allow a candidate's signed notice of withdrawal with a different address to update that candidate's voter registration address, simplifying paperwork; the committee passed the bill after election officials and county clerks discussed attestation and identification safeguards.

Senator Schmidt told the committee that Senate Bill 112 clarifies the legal effect of a candidate's notice of withdrawal by treating a different address on that signed form as a request to update the candidate's voter registration. "This bill clarifies how a candidate's notice of withdrawal is defined and used under Indiana election law," he said, and described the change as intended to "simplify the process for candidates and election officials."

Representatives from the Indiana Election Division supported the simplification but flagged potential gaps. Matthew Kochiver said withdrawal forms currently collect only a candidate's name and residence address and noted that current voter-registration updates include attestation questions (citizenship, age, penalties of perjury) that the withdrawal form does not. He warned that common names could require follow-up calls to verify which registration should be updated.

County clerks who testified — including Knox County Clerk David Shelton — said the change would be a helpful tool. Shelton described a past local investigation in which the absence of a physical poll book entry hampered prosecution and said it supported keeping records accurate: "I have documentation that she voted twice," he said, explaining why longer, reliable records and clear update mechanisms matter to investigations.

Following testimony the committee moved and seconded to pass SB 112. The committee called the roll and recorded a committee vote of 7–4 in favor, with two members excused. The bill will proceed from committee for further legislative consideration.