Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parks And Recreation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Alice Norman Park master‑plan concepts prompt debate over parking, amenities and concessions

City of West Sacramento Parks, Recreation, and Intergenerational Services Commission · April 7, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Calendar Associates presented three concept alternatives for Alice Norman Park on April 7; community and commissioners approved preserving field counts but debated parking trade‑offs, concessions, restroom siting and safety measures for surrounding streets.

Amanda Miller of Calendar Associates presented the Alice Norman Park master‑planning process and three concept alternatives to the commission, summarizing outreach with user groups and the community and showing how the team would incorporate top requests into a final hybrid design.

"This option matches the existing orientation of the fields," Amanda Miller said of Option 1A and noted the concept formalizes parking and adds shade and a walking loop. She told commissioners that Option 1A expands parking "to have a total of 115 stalls," a number that includes approximately 25 school stalls used in calculations.

Calendar Associates described Option 1B as an adjustment that moves T‑ball and additional practice space to increase parking; the presenter’s spoken transcript lists the expanded parking as "180 68 stalls," which is unclear in the record. Option 2 introduced a central amenity hub with a city‑owned cafe and, in the presenter’s figures, 215 stalls; consultants noted the city’s parking calculation target is roughly 300–400 stalls to accommodate simultaneous field use, meaning all concepts rely in part on on‑street or shared parking.

Commissioners and user‑group representatives raised concerns about parking trade‑offs with fields and other amenities, revenue impacts if a city‑run cafe competes with snack‑stand concessions, and safety for pedestrians near streets where children cross during practices. One commissioner suggested coordinating shuttles or shared parking with nearby businesses or schools for tournament days; staff said conversations with the school district and the MOT director about additional parking access are underway.

User‑group speakers urged preserving field layouts and safety features: one longtime user emphasized backstop height, durable construction for delta breezes, and preserving historical elements such as painted shade structures and the Rotary pathway.

Calendar Associates said they would combine favored elements into a hybrid option and return with a final master plan for the commission on June 2. No formal vote was taken; staff and consultants will continue coordination with the school district and city departments on parking and operational details.