Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Zoning board allows storage container for Southfield homeowner after neighbor support
Summary
The Southfield Zoning Board of Appeals granted a variance permitting a 20×12×8-foot shipping container for storage at 29700 Lhasa Road after the appellant and neighbors described business and screening plans; staff had recommended denial based on ordinance provisions and neighborhood character concerns.
The Southfield Zoning Board of Appeals voted to grant a variance allowing a 20‑by‑12‑by‑8‑foot shipping container to remain behind a single‑family home at 29700 Lhasa Road.
City staff had recommended denial, saying shipping containers for storage are not permitted under the zoning ordinance (Chapter 45, articles cited) and that the application did not demonstrate an extraordinary condition or hardship that would justify relief. Staff noted the container was visible from Murray Crescent and said permitting it could impair the intent of the zoning chapter.
Appellant William Goldsmith told the board he bought the container to store equipment for his small business after storage‑unit prices rose. "The prices raised. They were just absolutely ridiculous," he said, adding the container "would pay for itself within 6 months." Goldsmith said the container sits on a constructed platform with concrete footings and railroad ties and that he had gathered neighbor support letters.
During public comment, Pamela Gerald, a Southfield resident of more than 40 years, expressed concern about precedent and the container's visibility and footing. "If this particular use is not permitted, why has this container been allowed to be on the property visible affecting the quality of life to some of the people in the surrounding community?" she asked.
Board members asked about neighbor outreach, safety for children and maintenance. Mr. Rogers said the lot is large and suggested additional planting to screen the container; Mr. Jenkins asked the appellant to keep the site neat. Several members indicated they had no objection based on the property size and the neighbors who signed support letters.
Mr. Rogers moved to approve the variance; Mr. Jenkins seconded and the motion carried. The board instructed the homeowner to obtain any required city building permits.
The board’s action grants a specific variance for this property; the decision does not change the zoning ordinance and board members reminded the appellant that future nonconforming storage containers remain subject to city permitting and enforcement.
