Citizen Portal
Sign In

Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows

Interlaken Town answers state auditor inquiry, reports FY25 compliance and small building‑fund surplus

Interlaken Town Council · April 7, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council said the Utah State Auditor’s office received a complaint about the town clerk/administrator and the town has submitted audit materials; staff reported fiscal‑year 2025 reporting is complete, noted PFAS testing costs, and identified roughly $20,000 that could move from the building fund to the general fund.

Interlaken Town council members discussed follow‑up to a complaint received by the Utah State Auditor’s office and a range of fiscal matters on March 3.

The Chair said the auditor asked about certain expenditures and procurement related to an emergency road/water repair project and that town staff have been collecting and submitting records. "We just had an audit done by an outside agency, and we submitted that to the auditor's office," the Chair said, and added town staff were working through reporting mismatches that stemmed from incompatible systems.

Staff member S1 said the town is now compliant with fiscal‑year 2025 reporting and that the last required AUP audit report has been completed and filed. S1 described several accounting items the council had reviewed, including a discovery of roughly $14,000 in accumulated administrative fees and an additional ~$22,000 in building‑fund balances that are not tied to liabilities; S1 said about $20,000 could be transferred into the general fund while maintaining a conservative cushion.

S1 also noted a one‑time cost for state‑mandated PFAS testing of the town’s water supply, which contributed to higher chemical‑monitoring expenses this year. The council discussed moving certain fee lines and reclassifying a payroll/benefit line to improve clarity in next year’s budget.

No formal action was taken at the March 3 meeting on budget amendments; staff said they will return with proposed adjustments for a future meeting so the year‑end reports better reflect actual spending.