Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Parking topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council orders ordinance committee to reconcile conflicting RV and front-yard parking rules
Summary
After extended debate, Saint Albans council voted to send conflicting zoning language about recreational vehicles and front-yard parking to the ordinance committee to draft a consistent proposal and return it for public review.
Saint Albans city council voted to send disputed language in the zoning code to the ordinance committee after council members argued that current text contains contradictions over whether recreational vehicles and towed trailers may be parked in front yards.
Council discussion began when council agreed to refer proposed clarifying language addressing Articles 13.33.011, 13.33.0.03 and 13.33.08 so the city could better ensure recreational vehicles are not parked in ways that affect sight lines and intersections. A council member then moved to preserve an existing sentence that prohibits “recreational vehicles and trailers designed to be towed by another vehicle” from being stored in front yards, an amendment that supporters said would stop people staging boats or pontoon trailers on front pads that undermine neighborhood appearance.
Members debated several turning points: the transcript shows conflicting lines in the code that at once allow certain front-yard parking and elsewhere restrict it; multiple speakers said the city has historically permitted some front-yard pads and that homeowners may have relied on those rules when they bought property. One council member asked whether the council should summon a full rewrite or simply send a clarified ordinance to Planning & Zoning; other members said the ordinance committee should draft a single, coherent ordinance to present to Planning & Zoning and the public.
Council emphasized grandfathering for existing concrete pads and driveway work that were permitted previously; one council member said residents who were given a variance or who had work done at the city'direction should not be penalized. The council also discussed where to hold public hearings and whether hearings should be sized for larger turnout.
The motion to send the matter to the ordinance committee carried. Council members said they want the ordinance committee to prepare a consolidated draft to avoid later contradictory language and to ensure clear public notice prior to any future vote.
Next steps: the ordinance committee will draft consolidated wording, which the council expects to send to Planning & Zoning and then to public hearing before returning to council for further action.
