Lifetime Citizen Portal Access — AI Briefings, Alerts & Unlimited Follows
Agency officials propose waiver to let NEK Choice students attend public pre-K in New Hampshire
Loading...
Summary
Agency officials told the House Education Committee a waiver in S.214 would let NEK Choice School District students attend public pre-K in neighboring New Hampshire communities, citing small cohort sizes (about seven children per cohort) and recommending waiver flexibility to avoid complex new reporting or funding rules.
Janet McLaughlin, deputy commissioner in the Department for Children and Families, told the House Education Committee on April 8 that S.214 would create a targeted waiver to allow Vermont children in NEK Choice School Districts to attend public pre-K programs in New Hampshire communities where they will later attend kindergarten.
McLaughlin said the agencies considered multiple approaches and settled on a waiver because New Hampshire lacks a universal public pre-K structure that Vermont could simply adopt; provider types and program hours vary across the border. "This is something that we've been wanting we've all been wanting to solve for a while," McLaughlin said, describing visits to local leaders and Lancaster School District officials while drafting the proposal.
Officials estimated the number of children affected is small — "maybe, I think the estimate is an average of, 7 children per age cohort" — and argued a waiver would let districts demonstrate how key pre-K requirements are met without imposing a new statewide reporting regime. McLaughlin described the existing pre-K tuition payment for nonpublic programs as about $4,000 for 10 hours of pre-K and noted some New Hampshire programs offer longer hours (for example, a 15-hour Lancaster program), which the waiver could flexibly accommodate.
Agency general counsel Emily Simmons said the drafting team built the waiver and language to minimize new definitions and reporting burdens; she offered to walk committee members through specific word choices as needed. Committee members asked clarifying questions about private providers and payment flows; presenters said tuition payments would continue to be managed through the supervisory union in current arrangements.
The committee paused to move on to other agenda items after the presentation; no vote was taken on S.214 during this session.

