Board backs looser corner-lot accessory rules but adds screening requirement

The Planning & Advisory Board recommended revisions to city code that would allow accessory structures (sheds, gazebos, similar features) to be placed closer to the secondary-street side of corner lots — the so-called "second front yard" — while preserving setbacks, permitting thresholds and engineering requirements for wind uplift.

Staff explained the revision aims to reduce repetitive variances to the Board of Adjustment and reflects existing patterns where corner lots often need more usable yard space. The draft keeps limits on enclosed structures (different spacing rules for structures above specified square-foot thresholds) and requires stamped engineering for permanent accessory buildings to ensure hurricane uplift standards are met.

Homeowners expressed mixed views: some said a shed in the second-front-yard could be an eyesore when visible from neighboring properties, while Diane Douglas (resident) said a well-built shed could actually tidy a small backyard and be an improvement. Several members suggested adding screening or landscape-buffer requirements so neighbors are not forced to look directly at accessory structures. One board member moved to recommend the accessory-structure changes "as written" with the addition of required screening consistent with other parts of the code; the motion passed on board vote.

The board also reviewed related fence verbiage to reduce some 5-foot offset requirements on corner lots to make existing fencing more conforming; members approved language intended to reduce routine BOA applications for minor fence locations. Staff noted nonconforming fixtures already in place would remain grandfathered unless rebuilt beyond the allowed damage threshold.