Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Dog Park topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Dog‑park plan at Heron Pond draws both support and requests for environmental review

Milford Board of Selectmen · October 13, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Proponents presented a roughly one‑acre dog‑park design off Heron Pond Road; supporters said the site will provide safe off‑leash space, while conservation groups urged delay pending review of past warrant‑article intent and state wildlife input citing potential impacts to threatened or endangered species.

Town staff and project proponents presented a refined plan Oct. 13 for a fenced, double‑gated dog park on an area off Heron Pond Road of about one acre, with future space reserved for a parking area and vehicle gates for emergency access.

Proponents described the layout (airlocks, center section, vehicle gates) and said they will return with updated cost quotes and a public hearing once the board signals support for the site. Board members asked about neighborhood outreach, possible impacts on the unused fields, and whether a full‑size practice field could be retained.

Conservation concerns: Suzanne Fournier, coordinator of Brock's Environmental Citizens, reminded the board voters previously approved sports fields on Heron Pond Road via a warrant article and said that converting the parcel to a dog park may be inconsistent with that voter intent. She also relayed a request from the state Fish & Game non‑game and endangered wildlife program for more time to provide an ecological statement, saying prior mowing has affected threatened and endangered wildlife on the site.

Board response and next steps: Members acknowledged the legal and environmental questions and asked proponents to get updated quotes and to proceed with required public hearings and agency notifications. The board did not approve construction at the meeting and indicated it will seek additional information on the warrant‑article language and any Fish & Game input before deciding.

Quote: "I want to bring that to your attention — I don't think switching to a dog park is legal, according to this warrant article," Suzanne Fournier said, urging delay until the state can provide its assessment.

What happens next: Proponents will submit updated cost estimates and staff will schedule the required public hearings and obtain any necessary conservation and voting‑intent clarifications before the board considers a formal acceptance of funding or final approval.