Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Nuisance Ordinance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Keokuk council adopts ordinance naming noxious odors a nuisance after residents cite Roquette emissions

Keokuk City Council · January 16, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After several residents described persistent sewage- and ammonia-like odors they attribute to Roquette, the Keokuk City Council amended the city nuisance code to explicitly include noxious odors and voted to adopt the ordinance on final reading.

The Keokuk City Council adopted an amendment to the city code that explicitly lists noxious odors and fumes as a nuisance, a change council and city legal staff said clarifies how the city will address repeated odor complaints.

The move followed citizen comments about recurring, intrusive odors attributed to the nearby Roquette facility. Resident Beth Reid told the council the odor frequently seeps into her home and has caused ongoing respiratory and sleep problems for her family. "The smell is overwhelming, intrusive, and impossible to ignore," Reid said. Council discussion also included a council member's warning that the emissions could include "hydrogen sulfide, methane, ammonia," and staff noted steps already taken to document complaints.

City legal counsel explained the ordinance language places noxious odors and emissions of fumes directly into Title 5 (nuisances) where the Iowa code already provides authority; counsel said the addition was recommended to make enforcement steps clearer in the local code. The proposed ordinance (amending chapter 5.24.020) was read, moved, and passed on initial reading; the council then voted to waive the second and third readings and adopted the ordinance on final approval.

Council members discussed enforcement mechanics. One council member asked whether enforcement under the ordinance would be handled as civil or criminal violations; staff described existing procedures and said nuisance orders had already been issued to the plant. "We've already issued them, and we've already done that," a city staff speaker said during discussion.

The ordinance passage was followed by questions about operational fixes and monitoring. Staff said they are collecting records, tracking wind direction when complaints are reported, and attempting to work with Roquette management. The council did not announce additional emergency penalties at the meeting; staff said they are pursuing investigative steps and will report back as further information becomes available.

Next steps: the ordinance is adopted into city code and staff will continue to gather records, pursue samples and follow up with the state DNR and other regulators as appropriate. Residents who lodged complaints were encouraged to continue documenting incidents for the city and state agencies.