Citizen Portal
Sign In

AHS outlines plan to obligate $195 million in rural health transformation award, flags federal oversight and provider‑payment cap

Agency of Human Services update on Rural Health Transformation · April 9, 2026

Loading...

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Agency of Human Services officials said Vermont won a $195 million first‑year award under CMS’s Rural Health Transformation initiative, described tight federal timelines and a cooperative‑agreement review process that will require CMS scrutiny of subrecipient budgets and may limit some provider payments.

Agency of Human Services officials told a committee they have been awarded $195 million for the first year of the federal Rural Health Transformation (RHT) initiative and are racing to obligate funds while navigating close federal oversight and limits on some provider payments.

"This is a $50 billion initiative from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services," said Jill Meza Olsen, Medicaid and Health Systems director at the Agency of Human Services. "Our first year award is $195,000,000. We applied for $200,000,000, and that is the path that we're on." She added the program’s Notice of Funding Opportunity arrived in September with a Nov. 5 application deadline, producing a rapid timeline for states.

The award comes as a cooperative agreement rather than a simple grant, Olsen said, meaning CMS will review subrecipient grant agreements and contractor budgets closely before the state can sign them. "They are going deep down into the weeds on those agreements," she said, describing questions other states raised about line items such as mileage or small supplies.

Why it matters: the agency must obligate money quickly to meet federal deadlines — Olsen said the first annual report to CMS is due in August and the obligation deadline is in October — and the August submission will influence the second‑year award. That schedule has pushed staff to prioritize projects that can be launched rapidly and to build sustainability plans so successful pilots do not collapse when one‑time funds end.

Agency officials said there is some internal flexibility to adjust budgets without CMS reapproval — roughly around 10% — but larger changes will require back‑and‑forth with federal reviewers. Olsen described a recent challenge tied to a provider‑payment cap: CMS is limiting certain provider payments (discussed in the meeting as a 15% cap tied to the state award), prompting staff to rework the program blueprint and remove or reclassify items so dollars can be released.

"We had several projects that were not where the dollars weren't yet released to us because they thought that they might be provider payments," Olsen said. "We had to clarify whether they were, and we had to make sure they didn't add up to more than $29,000,000, which they did."

What’s being funded: Olsen listed RFPs already posted or near release, including dialysis and ventilator support for nursing homes, training programs, regional hubs, substance‑use recovery housing (leasing support rather than new construction), mobile units, dental and oral‑health projects, and funds to support the agency’s strategic planning. She said many solicitations remain open and the agency will post RFPs and notices on its RHT landing page and cross‑post through state procurement channels.

Agency process and next steps: AHS staff said they have biweekly meetings with a CMS program officer, attended a required Baltimore conference, and expect a site visit in June. Over the next months, they will learn how CMS intends to review and approve subrecipient grants and contracts and will make budget adjustments as needed to obtain releases and obligate funds.

Questions from committee members ranged from whether RHT will support EMS communications and community paramedicine to whether the program includes upstream mental‑health projects. Olsen said some DMH (Department of Mental Health) projects are on the list and that EMS support may be possible, but subject‑matter experts will need to confirm specifics.

Olsen emphasized the agency’s effort to design projects with sustainability in mind: "We are trying to use the funds more for launching things that are then potentially billable services," she said, calling the award largely one‑time money intended to start services that can later be supported by billing or other revenue.

The agency will resend the slide deck and the full project list to the committee and continue to post RFPs and guidance publicly. The first formal milestones are the August annual report to CMS, the October obligation deadline, and ongoing work to get subrecipient agreements approved so funds can flow to providers and vendors.