TTAC approves recommended architecture field of study; recommendation sent to commissioner
Loading...
Summary
The Texas Transfer Advisory Committee voted to approve a new architecture field of study, endorsing a studio-heavy curriculum and core courses; the committee will submit the recommendation to the commissioner for final approval.
The Texas Transfer Advisory Committee approved a recommended architecture field of study on a roll-call vote, agreeing that the proposed curriculum—centered on multi-credit architectural studio sequences and a small set of supporting courses—should be submitted to the commissioner for final approval.
Committee co-chair Laura Benick, presenting the recommendation, said the proposal preserves the core ‘‘studio’’ backbone of architectural education and pairs it with courses such as architectural history, college physics and foundational graphics and technology classes. "This backbone consists of a long class ... typically worth 5 to 6 semester credit hours," Benick said, adding that the studio sequence must begin in the first year and cannot be delayed.
The nut graf: committee members emphasized alignment with national accreditation and the practical need for transfer pathways from community colleges into university architecture programs. Benick told members the committee used National Architectural Accrediting Board learning outcomes as a common denominator when aligning courses across institutions.
During discussion, member Brenda Kiel asked whether the committee had reviewed program requirements across the ZIP codes listed in the recommendation. Benick said the committee reviewed learning outcomes for programs statewide and that membership on the subcommittee included representatives from programs intended to match the listed ZIP codes.
The motion to accept the field of study was moved from the university side by Mitzi Lauderdale and seconded by Anne Gilliard; a community-college motion was moved by Bridal Gibbs and seconded by Michelle McKee. The meeting record shows a roll-call vote in which the listed members responded in the affirmative and the motion passed. The committee chair noted the approved recommendation will be forwarded to the commissioner for final action.
Members also discussed next steps for other fields of study (engineering, music) and encouraged prompt responses to subcommittee participation requests so future reviews proceed without delay. The meeting adjourned after routine closing business.
The committee did not specify an effective implementation date; the recommendation now awaits the commissioner's review.
