Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Gaming Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Pingree Grove board votes to bar future gaming cafés after split debate
Summary
Trustees passed an ordinance prohibiting future video-gaming cafés while grandfathering the village's existing gaming cafe; trustees debated economic development risks and community character before a roll-call vote carried the measure.
Get email alerts on the Gaming Regulation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Trustees adopted an ordinance amending village code section 4-2-34 to prohibit future video-gaming cafés while continuing to grandfather the one currently operating in the village.
Andy, a village staff member who presented the item, described the ordinance as a policy choice the village has discussed previously. Legal counsel explained the ordinance uses multiple criteria to identify a "video gaming cafe," including whether less than 70% of an establishment's revenue derives from food and drink related to video gaming proceeds. "That is one of multiple criteria that we can use on the village end to determine whether or not something is a gaming cafe," counsel said.
Trustees engaged in a wide-ranging debate. Some trustees expressed concern the prohibition could discourage or complicate a major commercial development that had expressed interest in a gaming-related use. One trustee said, "I don't like this at all," and urged patience and negotiation with prospective developers; another trustee argued that some gaming cafes can deter other businesses and that limiting cafes supports the village's desired mix of goods and services. The police chief reported no incidents at the existing cafe.
After discussion a trustee moved, another seconded, and the board adopted the ordinance on a roll call vote. The transcript records dissent from at least two trustees; the board nonetheless passed the measure. The ordinance explicitly grandfathered the existing gaming cafe; legal counsel said that under the village zoning ordinance the operation would likely be treated as a legal nonconforming use and could be transferable on sale unless abandonment standards were met.
Staff said the village will monitor development reactions and that trustees could revisit the ordinance if unintended development outcomes emerge.

