Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Deescalation topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Aurora police chief outlines de‑escalation training, accountability checks and expanded less‑lethal options

Public Safety and Civil Service Committee · April 9, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The police chief described Aurora’s de‑escalation approach as communication‑first, described scenario‑based recruit and in‑service training, cited national best practices, and defended deployment of 40‑millimeter less‑lethal rounds while noting limits when officers face immediate deadly threats.

A senior Aurora Police Department official identified in the meeting as Chief Chamberlain (speaker 9) told the Public Safety and Civil Service Committee that de‑escalation is central to the department’s response model and that the department has integrated de‑escalation into recruit and in‑service training.

“De‑escalation is truly about the use of communication…time, distance, tactics and tools to reduce that need for force,” the chief said, adding that de‑escalation is an expectation but not required when it would increase risk to officers, victims or the public.

The chief outlined an immersive training model: recruits receive extensive de‑escalation instruction in the academy (the transcript reports more than 100 hours for foundational coursework), scenario‑based practice is incorporated into firearms and other training, and in‑service and supervisory review reinforce continuous learning. A commander (speaker 3) described programs used in training (identified in the transcript by acronyms such as ITEC/ICAP and ABLE) that emphasize communications and active bystander practices.

Chief Chamberlain also discussed less‑lethal options and logistics: the department has deployed 40‑millimeter foam/kinetic rounds across patrol units to provide an intermediate option, and he said inventory will increase in the coming year. He stressed that less‑lethal tools support de‑escalation tactics and do not replace communication and time, and that deployment protocols and supervisory checks are part of the accountability framework.

On data, the chief reported roughly 117 uses of force year‑to‑date in the transcript and said 91 of those were low‑level (grips, escorting moves), with about 25 at higher levels and 13 pit maneuvers counted in the same classification. He said motor‑vehicle thefts are down about 45% and overall crime down roughly 17.1% compared with an earlier baseline, and he reported zero officer‑involved shootings in the first quarter as a recent outcome the department is monitoring.

The chief acknowledged the limits of de‑escalation in rapidly evolving violent incidents and offered an example from his experience where an officer faced an immediate deadly threat and could not have safely used de‑escalation tactics. He framed that example to explain policy nuance — de‑escalation is practiced widely but not universally applicable.

Committee members asked about lethality risk and effectiveness of less‑lethal rounds; the chief said the 40‑millimeter foam rounds are intended to incapacitate or distract without penetrating, but he cautioned outcomes vary by context and by the subject’s condition (for example mental‑health crisis or intoxication). He said training, supervisory review and equipment availability together aim to reduce instances that escalate to lethal force.

Next steps: the department will continue training, expand equipment inventory as planned and maintain post‑event reviews.