Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Course Streamlining topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Hanover review: Sequoiastreamlining widened access but gaps remain for disadvantaged students

Sequoia Union High School District · December 19, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

An independent Hanover Research review presented to the Sequoia Union High School District finds that consolidating honors and prep courses increased access to higher-level coursework across several high schools, but disparities for socioeconomically disadvantaged students persist and the study cannot establish causation.

Hanover Research told the Sequoia Union High School District board on Dec. 18 that the districtstreamlining of ninth- and lower-level courses generally increased enrollment in higher-level classes and, in many cases, maintained or improved grades and AP/IB pass rates, while continuing to show persistent participation gaps for socioeconomically disadvantaged (SED) students.

The senior director who led the analysis, Matt Rigoni of Hanover Research, told trustees the project replicated the districtprevious 2023 descriptive study using an extra year of data and independent methods. "We do not find that these changes created less opportunity," Rigoni said. He cautioned the analysis is descriptive: "We can't necessarily explain why it is happening," and recommended further methods (propensity-score matching, regression analyses) and qualitative work to probe causes and local context.

Why it matters: the districtstreamlining policy merged parallel tracks and removed some honors-specific sections in favor of heterogeneous or integrated classes. Hanover found that, across multiple campuses, more students—including higher shares of Hispanic and SED students—were enrolled in courses that meet A–G requirements and in grade 9 math, science and ELA courses that previously had been limited. In some cases AP and IB exam participation rose and pass rates held steady or improved; in others (notably some Sequoia IB pathways), patterns varied by site.

Key findings cited to the board: - Enrollment in advanced-opportunity courses rose for traditionally underrepresented groups at several schools, and on average academic performance was maintained or improved in many measures (e.g., more A/B grades, reduced failure rates in some cohorts). - Site-level differences matter: for example, Sequoia High School (an IB site) showed large shifts in which advanced science courses students chose, and Sequoia experienced an 11-percentage-point drop in tenth-grade chemistry C-or-better rates that Hanover recommended investigating further to see whether students are meeting requirements elsewhere. - Science and math results showed notable increases in AP participation and pass rates at some campuses (e.g., Carlmont saw growth in AP science enrollment and pass rates); gains were uneven and SED students continued to participate in fewer AP/IB exams.

Reaction from the community: Dozens of public commenters urged the board to restore limited honors courses or otherwise address perceived harms. A parent said the elimination of honors had not met its stated goals: "Neither this report nor the staff report last September showed that result," one commenter said, citing petitions and more than 400 written comments. A teacher who introduced multicultural literature and voice said heterogeneous classes opened pathways for students previously tracked out of higher-level work.

Board questions focused on interpretation and next steps: trustees pressed Hanover on what "equitable access" means in practice and whether opt-out versus opt-in enrollment rules would close gaps. Rigoni answered that descriptive data show expanded opportunities but not consistent increases in SED representation in AP/IB at all sites: "Not in every situation," he said, and recommended targeted supports, MTSS frameworks, and stronger middle-school partnerships to build pipelines.

What the study does not show: Hanover repeatedly emphasized it did not establish cause-and-effect. "We can't say that streamlining caused these changes," Rigoni said; the firm recommended additional, more-controlled quantitative analyses and interviews or focus groups to explain mechanisms.

Next steps: Hanover recommended continued monitoring, targeted interventions to support students newly exposed to higher-level coursework, and community engagement. Trustees asked staff to bring back specific analyses and options (for example, graduation-requirement comparisons, dual-enrollment and CTE partnership options) for future discussion.

Provenance: Presentation and Q&A were delivered by Matt Rigoni of Hanover Research (presentation introduced SEG 1447–1499; full findings and Q&A SEG 1500–2638).